After fifteen or
so minutes of flipping through the huge New
Yorker volume, I came across an interesting article in the November 26th,
1932 issue. In between articles dealing with the possibilities of suicide and
feminine luxuries found on 5th Avenue (not to mention the loads of
advertisements) was a short piece on a childhood transition. Right from the
beginning, I could tell the author was trying to go for a personal approach.
With a title like A N’Yawk Childhood, I
feel like the author was trying to make his readers, most likely New Yorkers,
think back to the days of their childhood, growing up on the streets of the Big
Apple. In the article, author Joel Sayre describes the way he and his friends
used to play “mobsters” in the streets, constantly saying that murder and
assassinations were about to take place. To be perfectly honest, I had to read
the article two or three times to even understand that the mobsters were just
imaginary. That was the first major difference I noticed between 1930’s
journalism and contemporary journalism: the stories were much more like
stories, rather than features aimed at a mass audience. Just flipping through
the rest of the magazine I could tell that the pieces were aimed more at an
upper class, higher educated group of people as opposed to everyone like
today’s magazines aim to target. As the story went on, the author described his
lackadaisical lifestyle, playing with the other neighborhood children in the
morning and retiring to the local drugstore in the afternoon. However, his life
changes drastically when his parents take him out of public school and put him
in a prep school at the age of nine. His new friends, all already versed in
psychologist philosophies such as Jung, Adler, and Freud, teased him constantly
about his upbringings. The story abruptly ends when he explains he learned
these new kids didn’t know cards, and used that to his advantage to win money
and respect. All in all, I thought the article was a great example of a
coming-of-age story.
This volume of The New
Yorker issues was extremely
interesting to look through, mainly because magazines were so different 80
years ago compared to today. First of all, the issue I read only cost 15 cents,
nothing compared to the $5 price tag on an issue today. The actual articles are
much more prim and proper, having long, thought-out essays with literary
qualities rather than the short and sweet journalistic articles we are used to
these days. Lastly, I thought the advertisements were really interesting to
look at. We are used to catchy color photos with few words for our ads, but
these ones were wordy, descriptive, and had one basic, hand drawn picture. Overall,
I thought it was really cool to go back and look at a magazine from the 1930’s.
Hi Brian, Thanks for the great post on your -New Yorker- discoveries. I am glad you picked up the -New Yorker-; it's an interesting and important magazine which, supposedly, helps to set our literary tastes. You're right, though. Still today the magazine is aimed at more affluent and literate readers. I really liked the author and his friends playing mobsters, not quite the cowboys and Indians I played growing up. dw
ReplyDelete