As we touched on
in class, Huck Finn has been
challenged across the country because of its questionable racist themes and
ideas. However, despite many believing the novel is offensive and should be
banned, I never got that feeling during my second reading of it. On the
contrary, I actually felt the book acted as a subtle form of abolitionism,
hinting at tolerance and desegregation during a tumultuous time.
Although the book
is filled with racist characters supporting slavery and a heavy use of the
“n-word”, I still felt Twain intended for the novel to satirize that society and
point out its flaws. To me, Huck, despite referring to Jim as the “n-word” Jim,
never sees him as more than a travelling companion. Since Huck is just as much
on the run as Jim is, I think Huck is humbled and realizes that despite color
of skin the two are very similar. Huck is a young boy, and although he is very
capable of thinking for himself and making his own decisions he is still swayed
by the society and culture of the time, accounting for his use of the
derogatory word. His reflection near the end when he tries to decide whether or
not to turn in Jim proves that he is tolerant. In his mind, the debate between the
law (turning Jim in) and morality (letting his friend go) rages on, a battle
that morality eventually wins. If Huck Finn, the main character of the novel,
isn’t racist how could the novel overall be deemed racist?
On the flip side,
I felt that most of the main “racist” characters were Twain’s way of satirizing
the pre-civil war Border States. Just look at Pap. He is the epitome of a
drunkard, throwing around racist slurs and causing mayhem around the town. Is
that a character Mark Twain really intended for his novel to be reflected on?
What about the widow Douglas, who owns Jim? It’s not like Huck ever tries to
defend her. In my opinion, I found the novel to be more of a comment on the
racism of the time rather than a racist work. But hey, if they want to keep
banning this book, that’s their problem. They are missing out on a truly
wonderful novel.
Hi Brian, Thanks for the good post on -HF-. You are insightful to point to Pap. He is the most racist person in the book, and he is also the most loathsome and disreputable, truly the ugliest character. MT hit on a good strategy to make Pap the spokesperson for racism. dw
ReplyDelete