Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Candid Candide


When I read a novel, the first thing I do is try to relate with one of the characters, trying to find one that I can root for and consider to be the “good guy”. In this novella, it would appear to be easy to attach myself to Candide, a man seemingly fated to chase the love of his life forever with no luck. However, it really bothered me how stupid and naïve Candide is throughout the story. At the beginning, I really sympathized with him; he was kicked out of his home at a young age, put through the hells of war, and then forced to hear about the brutal murder of his soul mate. I even admired his positive demeanor, never giving up and firmly standing by his faith that the world will be good to him in the end. But at the point when he leaves Cunégonde in Buenos Aires is when I gave up on him. In all honesty, I consider myself a pretty positive guy. But I know that if I went through even half of the troubles Candide did, I would be ready to give up. We’ve all loved someone or something so much we feel like we can’t let it go, but eventually moving on may be the best course of action. Candide’s stubbornness honestly annoyed to the point of not being able to “root” for him anymore. Without a main character to pull for, I found myself disinterested in the plot and felt the story getting repetitive (i.e. he finds Cunégonde, loses her, goes through trials, rinse and repeat). When at the end he finally gets the chance to marry her and she has lost all her beauty, I wasn’t surprised at all. In most cases, when one desire’s something for so long, the image of the dream becomes so vivid that reality is not nearly as good. In this case, I think Candide pursued Cunégonde for too long to ever have a chance at a happy ending, as the constant thoughts of her beauty and grace masked the reality of aging, travel, and turmoil. I promise I am a very positive and sympathetic guy, but in the end Candide was much too naïve and for me to support him in his endeavors, and I believe at some point one must reflect on their decisions and really asses whether the goal is really worth it. In the end, it might have been better just to give up and start over.  

1 comment:

  1. Hi Brian, thanks for the good post. Candide is absurdly naive and trusting, at least up to the final pages. But then the novella is not particularly realistic. There are way to many miraculous reappearances of people supposedly dead, and way too many peculiar coincidences. But then Voltaire's purpose is humor and satire. Candide is merely a platform on which he constructs his satire. There's not much substance there. I look forward to our discussion. dw

    ReplyDelete